This is a response to a recent video by Christopher Cloos at @ChristianPhilosophyAcademy.
• Response to Schieber: 2 Objections to...
In his video, Cloos presents an objection to Schellenberg's divine hiddenness argument from a recent essay by Daniel Howard-Snyder which argues that, possibly, God may hide from people to attain a 'better start' to a relationship with them even while being perfectly loving.
I first trace the dialectic between Daniel Howard-Snyder and J.L. Schellenberg before examining Howard-Snyder's most recent attempt to undermine Schellenberg's argument. I conclude that Howard-Snyder's most recent reply fails to undermine Schellenberg's argument.
Web - https://www.realatheology.com
Twitter - / realatheology
Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/search/top?q...
00:00 - Opening comments
01:01 - Cloos' video reply
01:52 - Howard-Snyder's initial reply (1996)
04:41 - Schellenberg (2005) in response
05:39 - Howard-Snyder's updated reply (2015)
07:30 - Withdrawing from an existing relationship
09:02 - Ill-disposed nonbelievers
12:13 - Well-disposed nonbelievers
12:56 - Are they responsible for their being so well-disposed?
14:02 - Well-disposed with improper motivations
15:37 - What might God prefer?
16:26 - Why the accommodation strategy won't work here
16:51 - An even better pair of alternatives?
18:13 - Howard-Snyder's analogy
20:01 - Schellenberg (2017) in response
23:14 - An additional response by me
25:00 - Closing comments / Exit
Watch video The End of Divine Hiddenness? (Part 7 of the Divine Hiddenness Series) online without registration, duration hours minute second in high quality. This video was added by user Real Atheology 22 December 2023, don't forget to share it with your friends and acquaintances, it has been viewed on our site 837 once and liked it 44 people.