This is an unusual episode for me. Rather than responding to questions about graduate school, in this video, I responded to an interviewer performing an ethnographic survey about how researchers in bioengineering and bioengineering-adjacent fields view certain controversial subjects like human modification.
0:50 Would you be in favor of a prenatal treatment such that it would be possible for children to live 200 years?
2:04 What if we could guarantee no inequities, and anyone that would want it could allow their children to live 200 years?
2:36 Why wouldn’t you want to live 200 years?
3:03 Would you accept an intervention that would increase your cognitive capacities permanently?
5:16 Do you think all technological advancements improve society?
6:43 What would you change to improve society and human well being if not advance technology?
7:12 What are the barriers to technological interventions to societal problems?
8:10 What would you change about the human body if you could?
9:31 How do you respond to the idea that humans should live forever?
10:51 How about the idea that it is humanity’s destiny to take control over its own biology?
11:40 What do you regard as the appropriate relationship between humanity and the natural world?
12:35 Is it good that the human species is limited biologically?
14:03 Would you say that a human being is similar to a machine?
15:13 Do you think science should seek to understand everything?
16:02 Should humans be modifying nature?
16:50 Are there any biological species we should be modifying?
19:32 How does your work fit into the broader field of bioengineering?
Смотрите видео Should humans be modified? How about plants or animals? The Environment? Q&A on bioethics онлайн без регистрации, длительностью часов минут секунд в хорошем качестве. Это видео добавил пользователь Darren Lipomi 02 Ноябрь 2022, не забудьте поделиться им ссылкой с друзьями и знакомыми, на нашем сайте его посмотрели 202 раз и оно понравилось 7 людям.