Sheldon Cooper commits non-sequitur | Logical Fallacies in The Big Bang Theory
Sheldon's argument about the purpose of his relationship agreement with Amy doesn't quite follow logic. Unpack the Non-Sequitur fallacy with this engaging analysis, and see 'The Big Bang Theory' in a new, more critical light.
Fallacy of Composition
Also known as derailment, “that does not follow”, irrelevant reason, invalid inference, non-support, argument by scenario [form of], false premise [form of], questionable premise [form of]
Definition
When the conclusion does not follow from the premises. In more informal reasoning, it can be when what is presented as evidence or reason is irrelevant or adds very little support to the conclusion.
Logical Form
Claim A is made.
Evidence is presented for claim A.
Therefore, claim C is true.
To learn more about this fallacy
https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/l...
Disclaimer
The ‘The Big Bang Theory’ scene featured in this video is not my original content. It is used under fair use for the purpose of learning logic fallacies. All rights belong to their respective owners.
#NonSequitur #RelationshipAgreement #SheldonAndAmy #TheBigBangTheoryExplained #LogicalFlaws #ArgumentAnalysis
Watch video Sheldon Cooper commits non-sequitur | Logical Fallacies in The Big Bang Theory online without registration, duration hours minute second in high quality. This video was added by user PsychOut 07 May 2024, don't forget to share it with your friends and acquaintances, it has been viewed on our site 54 once and liked it people.