How to Convert SQL Server Queries to PostgreSQL: A Simple Guide to Using STRING_AGG
Learn how to effectively migrate SQL Server code to PostgreSQL using `STRING_AGG` for group concatenation in this detailed guide.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/72837154/ asked by the user 'Dilyor Toshboltayev' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/14666937/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/72837209/ provided by the user 'Tim Biegeleisen' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/1863229/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.
Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: How to parse this code from SQL SERVER to POSTGRESQL?
Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.
If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
How to Convert SQL Server Queries to PostgreSQL: A Simple Guide to Using STRING_AGG
Migrating code from SQL Server to PostgreSQL can be a daunting task, especially when you encounter specific functions and syntax that differ between these two powerful database systems. This post is designed to help you understand how to parse a code snippet from SQL Server into PostgreSQL seamlessly. We will analyze a query that utilizes SQL Server’s STUFF function and provide a practical solution using PostgreSQL’s STRING_AGG function.
Understanding the Problem: SQL Server Query
Let's take a look at the SQL Server code we need to convert:
[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]
Breakdown of the SQL Server Code
Purpose: The query retrieves the GroupNo, AuthorityGroupName, and UseYesNo from the TAuthorityGroup table and concatenates user type names from the TDetailCode and TUserAuthority tables.
Key Function: The use of STUFF() in combination with FOR XML PATH() serves to create a comma-separated list of CodeName values.
Finding the Solution: PostgreSQL Equivalent
The equivalent to SQL Server’s string concatenation is provided by PostgreSQL’s STRING_AGG function, available from version 9 onwards. This function streamlines the entire operation, allowing for a more straightforward query.
Converted PostgreSQL Query
Here's how the SQL Server code translates into PostgreSQL:
[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]
Key Changes in the Conversion
Join Syntax: PostgreSQL uses a more straightforward join syntax with LEFT JOIN instead of INNER JOIN where appropriate.
String Aggregation: Instead of STUFF, we utilize STRING_AGG(c.CodeName, ', ') to generate the user type names as a comma-separated list.
Grouping: Ensure to correctly use the GROUP BY clause to include all selected fields that are not aggregated.
Conclusion
Migrating code from SQL Server to PostgreSQL doesn't have to be overwhelming. By understanding the specific functions and their equivalents in PostgreSQL, you can seamlessly adapt your queries. In this example, we learned how to replace the complex string concatenation method of SQL Server with a simple, clean, and effective STRING_AGG function.
Now you're equipped to tackle similar queries! Happy coding!
Watch video How to Convert SQL Server Queries to PostgreSQL: A Simple Guide to Using STRING_AGG online without registration, duration hours minute second in high quality. This video was added by user vlogize 06 April 2025, don't forget to share it with your friends and acquaintances, it has been viewed on our site No once and liked it like people.