Regulatory Theory: Preemptive Rule-making vs. Common Law Redress [EBR4]
What regulatory approach best fosters commercial innovation? Traditionally, it had been thought that ex post, decentralized approaches that exploit private attorney generals like the common law were best, but many business interests today advocate ex ante, centralized, public sector approaches like federal statutes or federal rulemakings that preempt the common law. This panel will explore which attributes of regulation best serve innovation: ex ante or ex post? Decentralized or centralized? Public sector or private sector?
Featuring:
--Prof. Brian T. Fitzpatrick, Professor of Law, Vanderbilt University Law School
--Prof. Brian Galle, Georgetown University Law Center
--Prof. Michael S. Greve, Professor of Law, Antonin Scalia Law School, George Mason University
--Mr. Adam Thierer, Senior Research Fellow, Mercatus Center, George Mason University
--Moderator: Hon. Rachel Brand, Chairman, Litigation Practice Group
The Mayflower Hotel
Washington, DC
Watch video Regulatory Theory: Preemptive Rule-making vs. Common Law Redress [EBR4] online without registration, duration hours minute second in high quality. This video was added by user The Federalist Society 20 May 2016, don't forget to share it with your friends and acquaintances, it has been viewed on our site 6,326 once and liked it 14 people.