A growing number of companies are abandoning open source in favour of "source available" licences that protect their commercial interests. Unfortunately, not all are presenting the changes clearly; using ambiguous or misleading phrases that make their proprietary software sound like it's still open source.
Others still are straight up claiming to be open source, despite the inclusion of restrictions that directly contradict the commonly accepted definition of open source.
Some call this "openwashing". Some call it "faxupen source". I call it "fake".
💬 Follow Me
/ andrewmrquinn
📽️ Related Video: Open Source Licence Types
• Open Source Licence Types
📽️ Related Video: Elasticsearch Vs OpenSearch
• Search War: Elasticsearch Vs OpenSearch
📄 Open Source Definition
https://opensource.org/osd
📄 Server Side Public License (SSPL)
https://www.mongodb.com/legal/licensi...
📄 Llama Community Licence & Acceptable Use Policy
https://llama.meta.com/llama3/license/
https://llama.meta.com/llama3/use-pol...
🌐 OSI Approved Licences
https://opensource.org/licenses
🌐 Open Source Initiative: Claims to Authority
https://opensource.org/authority
https://opensource.org/blog/osd_affir...
Video timestamps:
0:00 - Introduction
1:04 - Meta & Llama
1:26 - Defining Open Source
2:28 - Meta & Llama (cont.)
3:50 - MongoDB & the SSPL
5:43 - Elastic & the SSPL
6:54 - Graylog & the SSPL
10:14 - The SSPL Is Not Open Source
16:34 - My Advice
#OpenSource #Openwashing #FauxpenSource
Watch video Fake Open Source Is a Problem online without registration, duration hours minute second in high quality. This video was added by user Pro Tech Show 29 August 2024, don't forget to share it with your friends and acquaintances, it has been viewed on our site 93,025 once and liked it 5 thousand people.